ICWA Weekly News 4-10-24
Hospital workers to appeal cases; Dr. Cole's blood pathology warnings from 2022 still relevant; DoH have difficulty mapping Fluoride in your water; Vax-unVax Study Events NEXT WEEK.
In this issue:
Shriners and PeaceHealth Hospital Workers to Appeal Their Cases
Dr. Ryan Cole Featured in Expose’ While Still under WMC Scrutiny
Do you know Fluoride Levels in your Local Drinking Water? The DOH doesn’t seem to know.
Upcoming Events: The People’s Study
April 16 Olympia – 12-2 PM, Lunchtime with Legislators Jim Walsh and Phil Fortunato. Also Dr. Paul Thomas. Bring a picnic lunch and remind Olympia that vax injury is real.
April 17 Seattle - Downtown Westlake Park. Noon: The Refusers Band. 1-3 PM. Dr. Paul Thomas, Dr. Brian Hooker and more. Hotel meet and greet after.
April 19 Spokane – Interviews all day. Speakers 4-6 PM: Drs. Scott Jensen, Jason Kinley, Kelly Victory, Paul Thomas/DeeDee Hoover.
Shriners and PeaceHealth Hospital Workers to Appeal Their Cases
Two issues ago, ICWA Weekly News reported that United States District Court Judge Thomas O. Rice dismissed the case pursued by twelve Shriners Children’s Spokane employees against Governor Jay Inslee, as well as denying the motion to file an amended complaint. Shriners Spokane fired the twelve plaintiffs for refusing to take the COVID-19 shots. A similar dismissal has already occurred for a case against PeaceHealth.
One of the main controversies called out in the case is the timing of the governor’s mandate for healthcare workers, which he issued two weeks prior to FDA “approval” of the first COVID-19 shot on August 23, 2021. Prior to the “approval,” the plaintiffs argued that the jab was only on the market as an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) product and, as an “investigational” drug, it could not be mandated.
Brian Ward, a litigation consultant to the Shriner Spokane plaintiffs, agrees that the two-week window between the governor’s mandate and FDA “approval” is a problem for the defendants. But he sees a much more a glaring issue with Judge Rice’s rationale in his dismissal.
“We will appeal both the Shriner Spokane and PeaceHealth dismissals and expect the Ninth Circuit Court to join the two cases and find in our favor,” Ward said.
For starters, in his recently published Common Rule Report that was delivered to members and committees of congress, Ward points out (on page 13) that the Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary issued an EUA for the Pfizer COVID-19 shot on the same day that the FDA approved Comirnaty.
For example, the HHS Secretary issued an EUA on August 23, 2021, for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine drug on the same day the FDA approved COMIRNATY®. Immediately following, the Secretary established conditions of authorization for Pfizer, Inc., “emergency response stakeholders,” and “vaccination providers” involved in administering Pfizer’s IND.
Page fifteen points out the contradictory language of the HHS secretary’s issuance of the Pfizer EUA where all stakeholders (anyone who handled the products) were told to include on all printed matter that the products were not approved or licensed, and were made aware to tell ‘all persons’ of their lawful authority to accept or refuse the product without consequence:
To ensure all parties involved in the EUA were made aware of the legal status of the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine drug despite COMIRNATY® being approved, the FDA required Pfizer, emergency response stakeholders, and vaccination providers to “conspicuously” state on all printed matter and advertising that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine drug “has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA” [footnote 36] (emphasis added).
Under EUAs for the federally funded COVID-19 drugs, a state’s health agency was legally responsible for ensuring all persons under its jurisdictional authority were made aware of their lawful authority to accept or refuse the product without consequence. The state had a ministerial duty to ensure vaccination providers it recruited to administer the federal property accepted an individual’s chosen option under 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III)
How do you think all fired, laid-off, unscheduled, harassed and shamed employees felt when they thought they could decline the EUA products? ICWA is surprised there are not more than a thousand plaintiffs in these cases. Hats off to those who chose to join these lawsuits.
Page fifty-seven in the report shows how the HHS secretary’s “additional” EUA for the Pfizer COVID-19 shot points to Judge Rice’s poor rationale for dismissing the Shriners’ case:
Federal District Court Judge Thomas O. Rice (Eastern District of Washington) ruled in a case [footnote 87] involving healthcare workers suing Shriners Hospitals for Children and Governor Inslee mandating individuals participate in the federally funded investigational new drugs under threat of penalty.
Judge Rice, without citing the Plaintiffs’ FDA exhibit stating that the EUA drug was not approved or licensed, incredulously stated that “the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was effectively FDA approved and was not…under the EUA statute or PREP Act” and therefore, “Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants’ vaccination policy was unlawful because an FDA-approved vaccine was unavailable fall short.”[Emphasis added.]
Moreover, the Plaintiffs informed the Judge that if he ruled that the investigational drugs were “effectively approved,” he would be implying that the HHS Secretary committed a felony by lying to Congress when the Secretary issued additional EUAs since Congress restricts that action if an FDA-approved drug exists in the marketplace.
Judge Tom Rice willfully defied the authority of Congress to establish drug classifications and its agencies' empowerment to manage those classifications. Moreover, Judge Rice was educated not only on drug labeling laws but also on how those laws impact the financial, health, and legal rights of Plaintiffs. Still, Judge Rice chose to invent a drug classification to provide legal cover for Shriners Hospitals for Children, who signed a contract with the federal government and then committed fraud against the Republic by engaging in other administration of the federally funded drugs outside of Plaintiffs’ legally effective informed consent.
Ward then carried this important argument over to the PeaceHealth workers’ case:
Federal District Court Judge Robert J. Bryan (Western District of Washington) ruled in a case involving medical practitioners, PeaceHealth, and Governor Inslee mandating individuals participate in the federally funded investigational new drugs under threat of penalty. Moreover, PeaceHealth’s CEO, Liz Dunn, required healthcare workers to publicly display their private health information on badges under threat of penalty, a most severe violation of HIPAA laws enacted by Congress.
Judge Robert J. Bryan was provided with similar facts as in the Shriners case but stated that “a difference in [drug] labeling does not change the outcome of this case.” Why should such a statement concern Congress? The $600 billion pharmaceutical industry operates under laws attached to their product’s labeling. Could an injured person, having received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine drug, sue Pfizer “as if” they injected COMIRNATY® into their body and use those corresponding laws in civil litigation? It is a well-established legal and judicial fact that drugs are regulated according to their labeling. Therefore, if a drug is labeled as investigational, then laws regulating that classification should matter to a court of law.
Federal Judges Bryan and Rice are effectively enacting laws declaring that once a drug is approved on paper, then all existing vials of the manufacturer's investigational version are automatically considered approved despite those drugs not being manufactured, distributed, labeled, or administered under BLA-approved laws (21 U.S.C. §355(a)). If the drugs are retroactively approved, then the laws governing all past administrations must be retroactive, which means injured parties have new legal theories to seek judicial relief in court from those injuries.
Much more can be learned about Brian Ward’s litigation work at Covidpenalty.com -
Securing Justice For Covid Mandate Abuse
ICWA is fully supportive of Brian Ward’s work in Washington and in other Federal cases.
ICWA asks you to consider contributing via GiveSendGo to their efforts to secure the right to refuse in our supposedly free country.
Dr. Ryan Cole Featured in Expose’ While Still under WMC Scrutiny
Last week, the Expose’ featured Washington physician and pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole’s information that he shared on a November 2022 Ask Dr. Drew show.
The first part of the three-topic article focused on Cole’s findings concerning cancer after the COVID-19 shots. Dr. Cole’s discussion on this topic began at the 36:30 mark when he showed a slide of lymphoma taken from a patient who recently had taken the COVID-19 shot.
The Expose’ summarized a portion of Cole’s comments:
The spike protein binds to a gene in our bodies that’s known as the guardian of the genome: the P53 tumour suppressor gene, Dr. Cole explained. “It also binds to a breast cancer gene and an ovarian cancer gene.” The spike protein binding to these receptors allows tumours to grow unimpeded.
There’s an uptick of some unusual cancers that I’ve been seeing … This should at least open the door to other pathologists and universities to say ‘well, we should maybe go back and look at some of these unusual fast-spreading cancers in young patients that we normally don’t see,” said Dr. Cole.
There’s at least a dozen mechanisms that the spike can induce in those cancer pathways … One way is that micro clotting can cause the “choking off” of tissues [as] cancers like an oxygen-depleted environment.
Dr. Cole’s hopes of follow-up on this matter have started to come true.
For starters, Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a renowned oncologist practicing in the United Kingdom, recently wrote an open letter to the editor-in-chief of the British Medical Journal, urging the journal that harmful effects of COVID-19 injections be “aired and debated immediately” because cancers and other diseases are rapidly progressing among “boosted” people.
Dr. Dalgleish wrote the following in his open letter:
As a practicing oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel.
Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters. They describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster – one developing leukaemia, two work colleagues Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and an old friend who has felt like he has had Long Covid since receiving his booster and who, after getting severe bone pain, has been diagnosed as having multiple metastases from a rare B cell disorder.
I am experienced enough to know that these are not the coincidental anecdotes that many suggest, especially as the same pattern is being seen in Germany, Australia and the USA.
The reports of innate immune suppression after mRNA for several weeks would fit, as all these patients to date have melanoma or B cell based cancers, which are very susceptible to immune control – and that is before the reports of suppressor gene suppression by mRNA in laboratory experiments.
Last week, the Epoch Times ran a story about a preprint study published in ResearchGate, which said that COVID-19 vaccination may have contributed to an increase in deaths from neoplasms like cancer during the 2021–22 pandemic period.
The MC/UC cancer death rate ratio “tends to be relatively stable over time,” researchers wrote. While the ratio was “relatively stable” between 2010 and 2019, it jumped in 2020, and continued to rise in 2021 and 2022. “This indicates a break from the existing trend in which people with cancer were increasingly dying of another condition or reason.”
Noticing the trend of increased reporting on cancer rates, The Expose’ also referenced Edward Dowd appearing on the Dr. Drew show when he told Dr. Kelly Victory, a board-certified trauma and emergency specialist with over thirty years of clinical experience, about the rise in cancer rates since the rollout of the COVID-19 shots.
Dowd said, “There was no signal in 2020; however, there was a “clear deviation” in 2021 and 2022.″
While showing plenty of charts and graphs, Dowd pointed out the very concerning highlights:
In 2020, underlying cancer deaths followed the trend and dropped to about 1021 deaths per 100,000 people. Cancer deaths rose to 1049 per 100,000 in 2021, then increased again to 1091 per 100,000 in 2022.
The data from 2022 shows a 6.85% rise in underlying cancer mortality rates per 100,000 people when compared to 2020. This is particularly noteworthy because it reverses a longstanding trend of declining cancer death rates. Moreover, when compared to the 2010 to 2019 trend, the rate of underlying cancer deaths in 2022 exceeded expectations by 11% to 12%.
Furthermore, underlying cancer deaths in total (not per 100,000) are also increasing at an alarming rate. To be fair, the slope was already slowly rising, but the 176,784 underlying cancer deaths observed in 2022 are far above what the trend line expected.
The original charges against Dr. Cole, filed by WMC Executive Director Melanie De Leon, include the following points.
1.2 Respondent made numerous false and misleading statements during public presentations regarding the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 vaccines, the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19, and the effectiveness of masks that were harmful and dangerous to individual patients, generated mistrust in the medical profession and in public health and had a widespread negative impact on the health and well-being of our communities.
1.21 is a WMC example of Dr. Cole’s prescribing of ivermectin: Respondent prescribed 18 mg ivermectin for five days and authorized one refill.
Cole’s prescribing of ivermectin went against the WMC’s misinformation statement, which specifically read:
Ivermectin is not FDA approved for use in treating or preventing COVID-19
But last month, the FDA agreed in a court settlement to remove all its warnings about treating COVID-19 with ivermectin. (also covered here ICWA Weekly News 3-27-24)
The successful lawsuit found that the agency exceeded its authority when it directed health professionals and patients not to use the Nobel-prizing winning drug. The question is: how will this court settlement impact Dr. Cole’s case?
As for Cole’s freedom of speech, such as he exercised on Ask Dr. Drew, the Federation of State Medical Boards announced the following, which was then echoed in 2021 policy statements by the WA Nursing Commission and the WMC:
Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license.
In the meantime, Dr. Cole, who asked as early as 2022 that others look into these warning signs, remains restricted by the Washington Medical Commission (WMC). The original press release announcing the investigation is the latest information available on the WMC site, where his license is listed as “Active with Restrictions.”
A Question of Washington Local Fluoride Levels in Public Drinking Water
At its March 13 meeting, the Washington Board of Health (BOH) decided to deny Bill Osmunson’s request for a public forum on fluoride in the public drinking water systems. Board member Stephen Kutz had pointed to WAC 246.290.490 and said that this should be taken up only as a local issue. The board agreed.
Since the board decided that this issue should be taken up on a local level, ICWA reached out to the Board of Health staff for data concerning the levels of fluoride used in drinking water by district or county.
Last week the Board of Health staff replied as follows:
Here is a resource you may find helpful: Fluoridation of Drinking Water | Washington State Department of Health.
The Department's Office of Drinking Water is currently working on updating a list by county with populations that fluoridate water. As we know more information and when that list is updated, we will reach back out.
The above link led to the DOH website in which the best it could do was a map of the Washington counties with scattered red dots that indicating “fluoridating systems.” Instead of waiting for an updated listed for who knows how long, ICWA has requested a current list by county. All we can say is, “Stay tuned.”
April 5, 2024 Episode of Informed Life Radio - - Notes and Links
Health Hour: Practical & Affordable Health
Guest: Karen Brennan
nutritionist who believes that a healthy lifestyle does not need to be complicated nor expensive. She discusses what she has learned over the years about the state of physical, emotional and mental health.
Liberty Hour: CDC Waste Water Spies & MORE
Learn about the noxious relationship between public health emergencies and wastewater surveillance systems. Does flushing the toilet provide personal data for agencies, such as the CDC, to track and surveil? How do these entities determine outbreaks that seem to materialize out of nowhere?
WA Events & Politics
Upcoming Events: The People’s Study with the CHD VAX-unVAX RV Comes to Three Washington locations in April
We are supporting Children’s Health Defense in what is the most unique and heroic project going on in the world - The People’s Study. The video crew on the Vax-unVax RV are capturing vaccine injury stories and this is your chance to raise your voice with others in the demand for safer/saner vaccines.
Other reasons to attend and/or tell your story:
Join the community that is striving to support you and expose the causes.
Make your story known so you might hear about other successful treatment protocols.
This is your last chance to be interviewed on the RV (not-a-bus;-) in person; if you are partially disabled, we will help you find parking and get you to/from the vehicle. Volunteers will be standing by.
See the thousands of signatures to memorialize those who have been injured.
Events - Children's Health Defense Washington Chapter (childrenshealthdefense.org)
The Olympia event on Tuesday, April 16 will be from noon to 1:30 p.m. at the Washington State Capitol Campus, 416 Sid Snyder Avenue.
Sen. Phil Fortunato and Rep. Jim Walsh are confirmed to attend.
Dr. Paul Thomas will also speak about his new KidsFirst4Ever endeavor.
The 42-foot long motorhome, bearing signatures of others harmed by unsafe pharmaceuticals, will be parked on the North Diagonal street. Interviews will be conducted at another location since Enterprise Services won’t let the RV use it’s slideouts.
No more interview times are available in Olympia.
The Seattle event will be on Wednesday, April 17 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at Westlake Park, 401 Pine Street.
The Refusers will perform their solid rock music from noon to 1 p.m.
After the music, the event will feature speakers until 3 p.m. with more music from Misty Flowers interleaved.
The amazing speakers for Seattle:
Dr. Paul Thomas, MD along with DeeDee Hoover LMT,CCT,PMT
In his latest venture, Dr. Paul has teamed with DeeDee Hoover to help kids get and stay healthy through KidsFirst4Ever.Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD
Chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense, author of Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak along with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.Dr. Michael Breneman, DC
Aiming to practice for 50 years, Dr. Breneman has been a long-time supporter of health freedom in the Pacific Northwest and has a family history to share.Dr. Sarah Kotlerman, DC
Sarah will be speaking on the options people have to regenerate their central nervous system and removing toxins like vaccine ingredients through chiropractic care.
The Spokane event, Friday, April 19 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. at a business location hosted by the Eastern Washington Freedom Alliance (EWAFA), 12929 East Sprague Avenue.
The RV stop features nationally-renowned speakers from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Just a couple close-in tickets remain for the speaking event for $25. Seats for $15 general seating are still available.
The amazing speaker lineup for Spokane – get your tickets now.
Dr. Scott Jensen, MD
Former candidate for Minnesota Governor. Dad, husband, long-time family physician, and former Minnesota State Senator for Carver County. He called out the strange change to the standard death certificates during COVID.Dr. Kelly Victory, MD
Dr. Kelly Victory is a residency-trained trauma and emergency specialist with over 30 years of clinical experience. Dr. Victory teamed with Dr. Peter McCullough and others at https://earlycovidcare.org/. She has also been a frequent guest on the Dr. Drew Show https://drdrew.com/people/dr-kelly-victory/ and is now named to the Board of The Wellness Company.Dr. Jason Kinley, ND
Dr. Kinley practices at Mountain View Vital Medicine, bringing a high-level of service to his patients as a naturopathic doctor.Dr. Paul Thomas, MD, along with DeeDee Hoover LMT,CCT,PMT
Your MC is Shawn Needham, RPh,
Moses Lake, WA Pharmacist and author of Sickened: How the Government Ruined Healthcare and How to Fix It. (on Amazon). Shawn and wife Janet host the long-running Health Solutions Podcast.
How ‘bout a Meme?
Hoping accountability is one step closer.
