ICWA Weekly News 8-23-23

HUGE NEWS: Federal lawsuit filed against Governor Inslee and PeaceHealth Hospitals by former employees. And One Health conference confirms that "climate change" will be leveraged against liberty.

Informed Choice Washington

Aug 23, 2023

By Gerald Braude & ICWA staff

In this great but long issue:

Radio Show links
NEW LAWSUIT filed filed against Governor Inslee and PeaceHealth Hospitals; an attempt to summarize all the great arguments of rights violations.
One Health Conference emphasizes “Climate Change” will be used to justify future restrictions on liberty.
Video is finally posted from our COVID Betrayal - Path Forward event, held in Spokane. Dr. Cole, Dr. Moon, Dr. Amerling, John Stockton. View, Follow and share.
Get Your Tickets for The Great Northwest Awakening, Oct. 21 in Vancouver. Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Immanuel and a surprise new guest to be announced this week.
For our Chiropractor members: we hope to see you at ChiroFEST Sept. 15-16 in Vancouver, WA. We are sponsoring a table with Children’s Health Defense WA and Oregon to remind doctors of our advocacy for their questioning patients.

August 18 Episode of An Informed Life Radio - show links

CDC Violates Own Rules for Shots During Pregnancy

Guest: James A. Thorp, M.D.

2nd Hour focus: Washington State

Red Pill Expo in August featured key speakers who will be in Vancouver, WA on Oct. 21 at the Great Northwest Awakening. Get your Tickets Now
YouTube’s Updated Community Guidelines & Policies
Pregnancy and Vaccination | Washington State Department of Health

Sixty-four Plaintiffs File Legal Complaint against the PeaceHealth Healthcare System and Governor Inslee

A filing in United States District Court, Western District of Washington reveals that sixty-four previous employees of PeaceHealth have filed a legal complaint against their former employer and Washington Governor Jay Inslee for “damages arising out of their unconstitutional, unlawful, malicious, unequal and contractually violative COVID-19 investigational drug mandate.” In addition to the Governor and the PeaceHealth organization, the other named defendants are PeaceHealth policymakers CEO Liz Dunne and Chief Physician Executive (CPE) Doug Koekkoek.

Near the end of the highly-detailed court filing, with every paragraph conveniently numbered, point 556 is perhaps the best summary of the comprehensive complaint:

The facts described above constitute violations of several of the rights guaranteed to Plaintiffs by the United States Constitution, federal statutes, and treaties. These violations are actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the Defendants acted under color of state law when issuing their COVID-19 vaccination requirements and administrating the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program Provider Agreement.

The comprehensive document lays out their case in a series of facts-in-law in a logical sequence. Early on, the filing reminds the court that COVID-19 shots were experimental/investigative medical products under emergency use authorization:

16. The FDA made clear on its website: FDA believes that terms and conditions of an EUA issued under Section 564 preempt state or local law, both legislative requirement and common-law duties, that impose different or additional requirements on the medical product for which the EUA was issued in the context of the emergency declared under section 564…In an emergency, it is critical that the conditions that are part of the EUA or an order or waiver issued pursuant to section 564A – those that FDA has determined to be necessary or appropriate to protect public health – be strictly followed, and no additional conditions be imposed.
17. In August 2020, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published the transcript of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, at which Dr. Amanda Cohn stated (@1:14:40): I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in the vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandated. (Emphasis added)

The court filing explains the damaging actions committed by Governor Inslee while hiding behind the PREP Act, originally signed into law in 2005, and by PeaceHealth executives Dunne and Koekkoek:

18. In 2021, individuals nationwide, exercising a federally secured right to refuse investigational medical products, were subjected to unconstitutional treatment by authorities disagreeing with the individual’s chosen option. Those individuals were not allowed to enjoy the equal protection of laws. They were subjected to severe human rights abuses violating ratified treaties, federal laws, and the laws of all US States and Territories.
19. In August 2021, Governor Inslee usurped the authority of the United States Congress by issuing an official proclamation in defiance of federal law when he mandated the use of investigational new drugs by healthcare workers. Additionally, Governor Inslee engaged in outrageous tyrannical conduct by mandating that healthcare facilities deny employment to healthcare workers who exercised their federally secured right to refuse investigational drugs.
20. PeaceHealth, CEO Liz Dunne, as PeaceHealth’s policymaker, and CPE Doug Koekkoek, decided that the suffering of the few was justified by the windfall such suffering had on PeaceHealth’s financial bottom line. Thus, PeaceHealth prescribed its own "required conditions” in defiance of Senator Edward Kennedy, Congress, and the rights of individuals under their authority as secured by the Constitution.
21. In August 2021, CEO Dunne issued a despicable illegal mandate that shocked the conscience. During the height of the pandemic, when hospitalization rates soared, and SARS-CoV-2 variants abounded, CEO Dunne subjected 16,000 employees to investigational drug use under threat of penalty and outside of their free will and voluntary consent. Should employees not comply with CEO Dunne’s fraudulent usurpation of authority, they were to be segregated, penalized, humiliated, and eventually terminated from employment, thus violating the federally secured rights of those individuals to refuse an investigational drug without penalty and causing harm to the ability of the hospital to provide a quality standard of healthcare to communities within the state of Washington.
22. Governor Jay Inslee used his office as official cover in hopes of obtaining for himself immunity from liability in future legal actions. Similarly, hiding behind the PREP Act as a liability cover, PeaceHealth, its policymaker, CEO Dunne, and CPE Koekkoek willfully chose to engage in violations of federal law. Defendants’ wanton conduct mirrors the abuses of power perpetrated against humanity that led Senator Kennedy and Congress to act in the early 1970s. Yet, half a century later, humanity in the United States still suffers due to the willingness of persons and entities such as Defendants to violate the lawful Constitutional ideal of treating all persons equally before the law.

The court filing explained how the defendants violated equal protection under the United States Fourteenth Amendment and disregarded existing U.S. law on informed consent.

327. Defendants refused to acknowledge federal laws providing Plaintiffs with the explicit authority to refuse COVID-19 investigational drugs without incurring a penalty or losing a benefit to which they were otherwise entitled.
329. Therefore, PeaceHealth, acting under color of law, violated Plaintiffs’ substantive and procedural due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment…
553. The 14th Amendment guarantees that all persons shall enjoy the equal protection of the laws. Defendants violated the equal protection of Plaintiffs when only penalizing persons exercising the option to refuse. The 14th Amendment guarantees the right to due process of law before infringing a citizen’s interest in life, liberty, or property. The defendants’ unwillingness to respect the authority of Congress by recognizing the statutory right of Plaintiffs to refuse 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 products and PREP Act activities without consequence nullifies the substantive and procedural due process rights of Plaintiffs.
554. Defendants committed arrestable offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 241 & 245 by interfering with Plaintiffs’ Constitutional and statutory rights and Plaintiffs’ involvement with a federally funded program.
555. Defendants’ actions demonstrate a willful and wanton disregard for the rights of the Plaintiffs, Congress, the Constitution, and their assurances under the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program Provider and FWA agreements not to subject Plaintiffs to medical experimentation outside of their free will and voluntary consent.

The complaint makes the following points about Governor Inslee’s and PeaceHealth’s violations of the PREP Act, originally signed into law in 2005, and amended repeatedly for COVID-19 responses:

195. Congress expressly preempted state laws interfering with the legal rights of individuals to decide whether or not to participate in the use of an EUA medical product under PREP Act authority. The preemption extends to at-will employment laws that private employers would otherwise utilize to interfere with an employee’s option to accept or refuse without consequence.
196. A private employer cannot lawfully establish 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 conditions contrary to Congress and those laid out by the HHS Secretary’s Scope of Authorization, and if they do so, the private employer would be usurping the authority of Congress to require that which Congress and the Secretary prohibit.
197. Congress, not the Defendants, determines who can participate in a PREP Act activity and the conditions under which they can participate. Defendants may not amend those conditions by usurping the authority of Congress.
203. Governor Inslee’s and PeaceHealth’s mandate of involuntary participation in a PREP Act activity and their corresponding actions to coerce, threaten, and unduly pressure Plaintiffs, changes the “voluntary nature of the program” into an obligatory condition, depriving Plaintiffs of their federally protected authority “to accept or refuse” without consequence…

As for the defendants, the court filing shows how PeaceHealth conspired with Governor Inslee to ignore the law:

253. The State of Washington and PeaceHealth are bound by law to conduct COVID-19 research activities, and also to obtain the legally effective informed consent of individuals, and to ensure that the Fourteenth Amendment rights of Plaintiffs are protected and secured at all times pursuant to the administrative functions of the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program.
254. On August 30, 2021, PeaceHealth, CEO Liz Dunne, and CPE Doug Koekkoek, conspiring with Governor Jay Inslee, and acting under the color of law, illegally subjected Plaintiffs to investigational drug use under threat of penalty outside of Plaintiffs’ free will and voluntary consent.
425. PeaceHealth, CEO Liz Dunne, and CPE Doug Koekkoek are legally sophisticated and have a history of conducting joint investigational trials with the National Cancer Institute. Moreover, PeaceHealth’s medical professionals have administered investigational drugs under 21 U.S.C. §360bbb protocols to individuals for years before the pandemic. They know of the statute’s requirements when administering investigational medical products authorized under the statute’s provisions.
426. Therefore, when Governor Inslee issued his proclamation ordering healthcare facilities to subject individuals under their authority to investigational drug use, PeaceHealth knew that the executive Proclamation was a direct violation of federal law and their lawful duties under the CDC Vaccination Program Provider Agreement.

As for the governor, the court document argues the following:

247. Governor Inslee is prohibited by Federal law from denying individuals the right to accept or refuse investigational new drugs funded by the Federal government or to apply consequences when accepting or refusing their administration.

The court filing details the steps PeaceHealth took to unfairly treat those who refused, in effect harassing and bullying their workers:

433. PeaceHealth, CEO Liz Dunne, and CPE Doug Koekkoek violated Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment rights when penalizing them for refusing administration of a COVID-19 investigational drug by October 15, 2021.
434. PeaceHealth only altered the employment of those who refused an EUA product and not those who accepted, severely violating the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.
435. PeaceHealth only terminated healthcare insurance for Plaintiffs placed on unpaid administrative leave after they refused administration of an EUA drug or refused participation in a PREP Act activity, which is a deprivation of the Plaintiffs’Fourteenth Amendment rights of equal protection.

The court filing points out contradictions in PeaceHealth’s policies that were obviously intended to give executives ‘an out,’ as well as discriminatory policies that shamed workers:

483. CEO Dunne attempted to shield herself and PeaceHealth from future litigation by creating a document titled “Covid-19 Vaccine Acknowledgment (caregivers).” It includes the following statement to which Plaintiffs were to attest by signing the document: “I am making the choice to get the COVID-19 vaccine on my own and freely. I know I have the option to refuse the vaccine or talk to my physician prior to receiving the vaccine. I ask that the vaccine be given to me.”
484. Dunne holds the proverbial gun to the heads of Plaintiffs, telling them that she will destroy their financial lives if they do not participate in one of the COVID-19 experimental drugs, and then compels them, under duress, to sign a document before receiving the product, or the product’s Fact Sheet, attesting that such action was under their free will and voluntary consent. Dunne’s actions are expressly why Congress passed the 1973 National Research Act.
485. PeaceHealth shocks the conscience when mandating, “Fully vaccinated HCWs will be provided a badge sticker by PeaceHealth that indicates vaccination…The badge sticker must be visibly attached to their PeaceHealth name badge or such other name badge used to be on-site at a PeaceHealth location and not cover the HCW’s name or other pertinent identifying information.”
486. By mandating that the “vaccinated” wear a badge sticker, PeaceHealth not only identified the “vaccinated,” but they identified by omission, and thus publicly shamed, the “unvaccinated.”

Included in the complaint were plaintiff stories of hardship under the enforcement of experimental and arguably illegal measures:

526. One Plaintiff best sums up the illicit behavior when stating, “Being pregnant and forced to wear an N95 was horrible. I already had a hard time breathing because of the baby, and then add an N95 to it, and it wasn’t bearable. I would go hide in the break room or med room to take my mask off and breathe. I became anemic and had iron infusions towards the end, so I truly was having a hard time getting oxygenated as it was. The N95 was so restrictive. There were many times when I felt dizzy and lightheaded, tingling of extremities because of constantly inhaling my own CO2. Managers would walk by and be like make sure you mask up. Can I breathe for a moment? Or would you rather me, a pregnant woman, pass out? I was extremely anxious because we had no idea if I would have enough PTO to get me through October to keep my insurance so I can deliver and not worry about the financial burden. By the grace of God, I had a few hours left to cover me. My anxiety was through the roof when COBRA quoted me $1,000 to keep my insurance. When I get anxious, I don’t eat, and my stomach turns on itself. That’s the last thing I needed to feel prior to birth. I would have doctors belittle me in conversation about not thinking about ‘my baby’s safety.’Coming into work sucked the life and happiness out of me. I was anxious and bitter. You walk in, and everyone stares at you and reminds you of your deadline before you get booted. To top it off, my husband, who is a truck driver, had his car truck completely broken down. Which meant two incomes LOST. The tears I shed for weeks could fill a lake. The tears left me exhausted, with pounding headaches, and heart palpitations. And it worsened as I would get closer and closer to the day I’d be placed on leave and have zero assurance.”
527. The absolute callous disregard for the rule of law and the health, safety, and welfare of the Plaintiffs is aptly demonstrated by the recollection of one plaintiff stating, “I was placed on leave August 31 2021, and my delivery date was October 20 2021. I was seen by Dr. Coleen Fox, an obstetrician employed by PH, and remained with her from the beginning and end of my pregnancy. When it was announced that all employees needed to be vaxxed, I immediately called the PH OB office, where the front desk told me, she was unable to receive any requests from patients requesting their OB sign a medical exemption due to pregnancy and lack of studies. The reason cited was that they were ‘following instructions.’After being denied my request to obtain a medical exemption, at my next appointment, my OB offered the vaccine, I respectfully and firmly declined and cited concerns that there were zero studies on the vaccine and its effects on pregnancy and the baby. Dr. Fox assured me some women had taken it with no side effects, and ‘these anecdotal stories’ have been reassuring. She also reiterated that the ‘board’ made a decision for the office to deny medical exemptions as the benefits outweighed the risk for those pregnant, and it would go against the advice of medical associations. She explained she could only provide a medical exemption in cases of suspected or confirmed allergy to the ingredients.”
532. PeaceHealth’s callous disregard for the safety and well-being of expectant mothers is unheard of by healthcare professionals. Its arrogant position that pregnant mothers who are also employees may not be granted a medical exemption from experimental drug use is illegal and medical malpractice.

Whereas the Washington Department of Health (DOH) has been asking the legislature for $35 million to combat non-government misinformation, the court filing had listed many of Governor Inslee’s false and misleading statements:

441. In August 2021, Governor Inslee issued Proclamations 21-14 and 21-14.1, stating: “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.” The statement was a direct violation of 21 CFR 312.7(a)’s restriction that “A sponsor or investigator, or any person acting on behalf of a sponsor or investigator, shall not represent in a promotional context that an investigational new drug is safe or effective for the purposes for which it is under investigation or otherwise promote the drug.”
444. The Governor’s statement lacked information people would want to know when considering participation. For example, COVID-19 mRNA drugs also had historical reports of adverse events, were not manufactured according to standards licensed drugs are manufactured, and had heart-related and blood clotting issues that were not common side effects of a typical “vaccine.” Additionally, he failed to inform recipients that Pfizer’s BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine trial lost 93% of its participants by the sixth month of a 24-month trial. Most importantly, Governor Inslee intentionally concealed that a person choosing to volunteer as an EUA drug recipient is prohibited from seeking any meaningful judicial relief when injured by the drug, specifically because they are under PREP Act authority.

The court filing also showed that there’s plenty of blame to go around besides the defendants. The court document illuminated the wrongdoings of the Washington state’s attorney general’s office and the Washington State Department of Health as well.

After all these claims of wrongdoing, it is gratifying to hope that these wronged employees will receive some justice. Under “Damages Recoverable and Demanded,” the court filing makes seven points, including the following:

623. When the Defendants’ behavior reaches a sufficient threshold, punitive damages are recoverable in § 1983 cases. Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 (1983). Because Defendants’ actions were intentional and willful, Plaintiffs are entitled to, and hereby demand, an award of punitive damages against each and every Defendant in an amount sufficient to deter them, individually and collectively, from repeating their unconstitutional actions. Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 (1983)
624. Because Defendants’ actions involved reckless or callous indifference to the Plaintiffs’ federally protected rights, Plaintiffs are entitled to, and hereby demand, an award of punitive damages against each and every Defendant in an amount sufficient to deter them, individually and collectively, from repeating their unconstitutional actions. Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 (1983)
625. Because Defendants’ actions were motivated by evil motive or intent, Plaintiffs are entitled to, and hereby demand, an award of punitive damages against each and every Defendant in an amount sufficient to deter them, individually and collectively, from repeating their unconstitutional actions. Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 (1983)

The court filing also states, “Plaintiffs are entitled to, and hereby demand, a trial by jury on all issues of fact herein.”

Here’s hoping Curtis et al vs. PeaceHealth and Jay Inslee can make it through preliminary motions and make it to evidence discovery. That might move the needle of justice in the state.

Stay tuned to ICWA and CHD-WA for an interview with those bringing suit.

The New Washington Gregorian Chant: Climate Change Crisis

For three years, the chant in Washington stemming from Governor Jay Inslee to fight COVID-19 was, “We’re all in this together.” Since all the emergency declarations and mandates have been lifted, a new chant has emerged.

At the Washington One Health Conference held on August 16 in Ellensburg, the prominent theme from the speakers was about facing a climate change crisis. Beth Lipton, a veterinarian at the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) and currently working on health impacts of climate change as well as emergency preparedness and response, best summed up the sentiments of the meeting when she said, “The need to align climate change approaches with one health approaches was very clear today, and that really resonated a lot with me as well.”

On that Wednesday, Washington US Senator Patty Murray emailed her constituents about the climate change crisis:

One year ago today, President Biden signed into law Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, a transformational piece of legislation designed to help families like yours save money on everything from energy to health care.
To recap, the Inflation Reduction Act:
Marks the biggest action to tackle the climate crisis in the history of this country—and has put us on a path to cut emissions by 40% by 2030.
Has kickstarted our transition to a stronger, clean-energy economy—and is creating thousands of good-paying jobs in the process.
Is already helping Washington state families save money on their energy bills at home and at the pump through new tax credits and incentives.

On that same Wednesday, Washington US Senator Maria Cantwell also e-mailed her constituents about the climate change crisis:

Today is the first anniversary of the Inflation Reduction Act!
I'm proud to have voted for this landmark legislation making historic investments in climate action, inflation reduction, and affordable health care.
The IRA enacted the largest-ever federal investment in climate action, and at a time when wildfires and flooding are destroying our communities, fighting the climate crisis couldn't be more important.

Again, On that same Wednesday, Washington Governor Jay Inslee, as a US Climate Alliance co-founder, also issued a statement about the climate change crisis:

Since we launched the Alliance in 2017, the urgency of climate action has only grown,” said Alliance co-chair and founding member Governor Inslee. “The Inflation Reduction Act is the most important federal action yet for super-charging state efforts to go further, faster in transitioning to clean energy. States are using these investments to create jobs and invest in communities. The IRA has helped put the United States back in the game in the global fight against climate change.   

The previous day, Governor Inslee welcomed United States Vice-President Kamala Harris to Washington to celebrate the one-year passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, and his ensuing press release stated that it would “become the largest single investment in climate action in national history.”

Governor Inslee even took to X (formerly Twitter), continuing to press the climate change narrative in all facets of society:

https://twitter.com/GovInslee/status/1691979667467886924

There is no acceptable tie with climate change - it must be defeated. Thank goodness we have a vice president who broke the tie with the vote to pass the Inflation Reduction Act to combat climate change.

In the video portion, the Vice-President said, "President Biden and I are taking on one of the most urgent issues of our time, and of course, that is the climate crisis. Every day around the world, the impact of the climate crisis is stark and vivid – we are seeing it in real time."

In the midst of all this, notably at the One Health Conference, no opposing voices to this climate change crisis have been heard. For example, nobody at the One Health Conference showed data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as viewed through ourworldindata.org, from which it is hard to claim any significant rising temperatures in the United States.

Annual Heat Wave Index 1895 to current (ourworldindata.org)

Nor was anyone from the Global Climate Intelligence Group invited to speak at the One Health Conference.

In the sprit of the Great Barrington Declaration, the Global Intelligence Group, along with 1,500 signatories, created the World Climate Declaration: There Is No Climate Emergency.

The early part of the declaration makes the following points:

Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific: Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.
Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming: The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted: The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC based on modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models: Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. Not only do they exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, but they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.
CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth CO2 is not a pollutant: It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters: There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts, and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities: There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are.

And as if the worldwide censorship of the COVID-19 narrative hasn’t been enough, Newsweek ran a story on July 24, 2023 in which Nobel Prize winner Dr. John Clauser’s speech to the International Monetary Fund was cancelled due to previous comments he made that disputed the climate change crisis.

Nobel Prize winner Dr. John Clauser, who has disputed issues surrounding climate change, recently was told he would not be speaking to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), according to Co2 Coalition, a non-profit organization that believes carbon dioxide is beneficial to society.
"Nobel Laureate (Physics 2022) Dr. John Clauser was to present a seminar on climate models to the IMF on Thursday and now his talk has been summarily cancelled," the Co2 Coalition said in a statement. "According to an email he received last evening, the Director of the Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund, Pablo Moreno, had read the flyer for John's July 25 zoom talk and summarily and immediately canceled the talk. Technically, it was 'postponed,'" the statement added.
The announcement by the Co2 Coalition came shortly after Clauser made comments disputing climate change during a speech in Seoul, South Korea, at Quantum Korea 2023, an international conference centered on the global trends of quantum ecosystem innovations from the academic, government and private sectors.
"I don't believe there is a climate crisis," Clauser said at Quantum Korea. "The world we live in today is filled with misinformation. It is up to each of you to serve as judges, distinguishing truth from falsehood based on accurate observations of phenomena."

So why are so many governing officials shouting out warnings of a climate change crisis?

Many journalists are noticing the coordinated effort and skeptical of the science being used: The Expose’ on August 4 covered an article published in Natural News that implied that One Health is the means toward implementing a climate change lockdown as the next step toward global totalitarianism.

Now that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) scamdemic is over, the World Health Organization (WHO) is busy plotting its next tyrannical scheme in the form of another round of lockdowns, this time to stop “climate change.”

Mac Slavo’s Discern Report busy plotting

Newly proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs) and the so-called Pandemic Treaty both incorporate what is known as the “One Health” approach. The One Health scheme will grant the WHO absolute “power” to initiate “climate lockdowns” at such a time that “global warming” is determined to be too much of a threat to ignore.
While vague and confusing, the language of the One Health scam is a tool to create networks and combine efforts toward centralizing power and control, which is always the goal of all masters everywhere,” reported Mac Slavo in the Discern Report.
Once that central power has been achieved then similar measures that were imposed in response to the COVID plandemic can be used for climate change, loss of biodiversity, human diseases, vector-borne diseases, and much more.

Congratulations if you’ve read this far. Our last request:

Get your tickets for the The Great Northwest Awakening, Oct. 21st in Vancouver WA. An all-day event with a country rock concert to conclude!

ICWA News & Action Alerts

Discussion about this post