ICWA Weekly News 5-8-24
Informed Choice WA reports: Do you trust school-based health centers? Marketing the latest COVID shots. Does Rep. Schrier know anything about the HPV shots she is promoting? Host/attend Protocol 7.
In this issue:
School-Based Health Centers in Washington
Washington Department of Health Begins Hype of Updated COVID-19 Shot Formula
Kim Schrier’s Ignorance of HPV Vaccination Reality
Host screening of Protocol 7
May 3, 2024, Episode of Informed Life Radio - - notes and links
Health Hour - Soil Health is Our Health
Washington organic grower Monty Norris on soil health and growing real food.
Foraging - https://www.youtube.com/@BoutenkoFilms
Mushroom foraging - https://www.youtube.com/@mushroomwonderland1
Grass and soil, midwest but good advice for everywhere: https://www.youtube.com/@gregjudyregenerativerancher
”Revealed: Dark Money Funders Behind ‘Disinformation Dozen’ Report’”
Liberty Hour - We Outnumber the WHO
Guest James Roguski provides updates about the plots and plans of the World Health Organization (WHO) and actions We the People of the world can take to protect our sovereignty and health.
An Update on the WHO Negotiations - James Roguski (substack.com)
ICD-10 codes: https://icdlist.com/icd-10/look-up
Palmdale passes ordinance to ban virus mandates | News | avpress.com
Ordinance-1577 (cityofpalmdaleca.gov)
The Growing Number of School-Based Health Centers in Washington
Big Brother is at it again. This time, it’s in Washington schools under the guise of “Healthy Kids Learn Better.”
The Washington School-Based Health Alliance is comprised of over eighty school-based health centers (SBHCs) while promoting the following agenda:
Working hand-in-hand with the school community, school-based health centers provide safe, age-appropriate, culturally-competent health care to students where they already spend much of their time–at school. Providing high-quality primary medical, mental health, and other health services to children and adolescents, school-based health centers are particularly effective in delivering care to young people who may not seek or be able to access care elsewhere.
Digging into the subject, we learned that the above alliance is the Washington affiliate of a national group, the School-Based Health Alliance (sbh4all.org), which promotes the following in-school services:
SBHCs conveniently offer a range of services, including many of those listed below, on school campuses so that children and adolescents can get back to class quickly and continue learning:
Routine physical exams, including wellness checks, sports, and work physicals.
Asthma, ADHD, diabetes, and other chronic illness diagnosis and management.
Acute illness and injury treatment.
Immunizations and vaccinations.
Routine lab tests.
Medication prescriptions.
Health education, counseling, and wellness promotion.
Fitness and nutrition education and counseling.
Case management for acute and chronic health problems.
As expected, the offering of vaccinations, lab tests, and medical prescriptions falls in line with the profit motives of the national organization’s partners that include Merck, American Academy of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins, UCSF, and Kaiser. The following organizations provide financial support to the Washington affiliate:
Ballmer Group, which, according to Wikipedia, is an American investment company based in Bellevue, Washington, that serves as a family office to manage the wealth of Steve Ballmer, the former CEO of Microsoft.
Community Health Plan of Washington (Apple Health – Medicaid)
Washington State Department of Health
Molina Healthcare
Swedish Medical Center
But a more ominous problem than rigging the economic system for corporate profits is how SBHCs interfere with parental rights. Stand for Health Freedom says in its brochure SBHCs and the Anti-Parent Agenda: “School-based Health Centers are not your typical school-nurse model of care where minor illnesses and injuries are treated. . . . Some proponents of SBHCs argue that these in-school clinics promote better access to health care for children and relieve busy parents of the burden of taking their children to the doctor.”
Stand for Health Freedom then provides the reality of the situation:
Medical ethics do not allow physicians to treat minors without a parent or guardian present, which is why parents cannot simply drop their child off at the doctor’s office and come back later to collect them. Are there limits to what the parent will allow the provider to talk to the child about?
Some concerning facts:
SBHCs are largely unregulated.
SBHCs are intended to replace the family doctor.
SBHCs often exclude the parent.
Education is already suffering.
SBHCs provide inappropriate access to children while parents are away. Children will suffer in the name of convenience.
SBHC services are broad in scope and do not require parental knowledge. There is no set standard for who employs the providers.
Stand for Health Freedom has excellent resources for parents on this topic. Its website has “Take Action” links, printable SBHC toolkits and resources, articles, and videos.
Another helpful resource is the Washington-based My Family My Choice. Its website sets forth the group’s purpose:
We oppose the top-down, one-size-fits-all government mandated policies that regulate our schools and daycares. Now we are seeing new laws and ordinances which lead to visiting our homes and monitoring our parenting styles.
This website will address major legislation that affects your rights as a parent, and inform you of actions that need to be taken to STOP this intrusion into the family.
Recent legislation in Washington has bolstered the infrastructure to ensure SBHCs continue to grow. HB 1225 created a school-based health center program office in the Department of Health in 2022, staffed with three and half employees at a cost of nearly $2 million a year.
The Washington School-Based Health Alliance was at the forefront of the passage of the legislation. They boast about this on their website:
In the fall of 2020, Representative Monica Stonier (49th District) convened a School-Based Health Center (SBHC) Work Group in partnership with the Washington School-Based Health Alliance (WA SBHA). The work group brought together over 30 state-level SBHC stakeholders including legislators from both parties, state agencies, and associations representing families, schools and health care. The work group identified challenges to the expansion and sustainability of the SBHC model statewide, and made recommendations for how to address these challenges, documented in the SBHC Work Group’s final report.
Legislation was proposed as a first step in advancing the recommendations identified by the work group. In 2021, the Washington State Legislature passed SHB 1225, which established a state school-based health center (SBHC) program office at the Washington State Department of Health (DOH). This office was established with the objective “to expand and sustain the availability of school-based health center services to K-12 students in public schools, with a focus on historically underserved populations.” The program will provide grants to SBHCs statewide and partner to provide training and technical assistance.
Of the eighty-plus school-based health centers permeating Washington schools, nearly half of them (thirty-eight) are in King County. Thirty of them are in Seattle.
As the second most-populated county in the state, Pierce County would be expected to be ranked second in SBHCs. But it has only two—at Mt. Tahoma High School and Bethel Middle School.
As the third most-populated county in the state, Snohomish County would be expected to be ranked as one of the highest with SBHCs. But it has only one: Meadow Dale High School.
Although Kitsap County is the seventh most-populated county in the state, it has by far the second-highest number of SBHCs, with eleven of them. As the fourth most-populated county in the state, Spokane County has four SBHCs. As the fifth most-populated county out of 39) in the state, Clark County has just one SBHC, which is at Evergreen High School.
Perhaps oddest of all, Jefferson County, ranked twenty-seventh as the most populated in the state with just 33,714 residents, has three SBHCs: Port Townsend High School, Chimacum High School, and the Quilcene K-12 School. Blue Heron Middle School is expected to get an SBHC. The SBHC in Quilcene epitomizes its transformation from a town at the last turn of the century that was strongly anti-government—notably their residents’ unwillingness to participate in the 2000 United States census—to one that is willing to embrace Big Brother.
Washington Department of Health Begins Hype of Updated COVID-19 Shot Formula
Nine years before appearing before the House of Representative subcommittee on May 1, EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak said the following at a workshop for “Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases.”
We need to increase public understanding of the need for . . . medical countermeasures such as a . . . pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
Once again, the Washington Department of Health (DOH) is playing its part in this hype of promoting the COVID-19 shots, this time by way of anticipation of a new formula. The DOH’s latest Partner Newsletter reflects this with their question and answer of the week:
You can follow all the publicly-available details of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee [VRBPAC] meeting, where a recommendation for an “updated” COVID product will be discussed, here: VRBPAC Meeting May 16, 2024.
The DOH continues to promote more jabs even though a recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic cited on May 3, 2024, in The Epoch Times on the effectiveness of the 2023-24 formulation against the JN.1 variant shows that people who received more than one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine were more likely to contract COVID-19.
The risk of contracting COVID-19 was 1.5 times higher for those who received two doses, 1.95 times higher for those who received three doses, and 2.5 times higher for those who received more than three doses, the researchers found. The higher risk was compared to people who received zero or one dose of a vaccine.
The Cleveland Clinic must be a very inconvenient location for performing studies on COVID shot efficacy. The Epoch Times also reminded us of the late 2022 Cleveland Clinic study:
People who have received COVID-19 vaccines are more likely to get infected than those who are unvaccinated, according to two new studies.
In one paper (pdf), from Cleveland Clinic researchers, each successive dose heightened the incidence of infection. The lowest incidence was among the unvaccinated.
In the other study, researchers in Indiana found that vaccinated people had a higher incidence of infection when compared to unvaccinated people who have natural immunity, or protection from surviving an initial infection.
Last September, The Epoch Times cited a California prison study also inconveniently calling out poor COVID shot efficacy:
Researchers analyzed data from 33 state prisons from January to July 2023 to try to assess the effectiveness of the bivalent shots, which were introduced in the fall of 2022.
Among 96,201 inmates with data on COVID-19 testing and vaccination, researchers identified 2,835 cases.
They found that 1,187 of the cases were among people who had received a bivalent vaccine, versus just 568 cases among the unvaccinated.
The rest were among people who received only monovalent, or old vaccines. That group was excluded from further analysis.
In the midst of all this, the DOH has stayed in line with the CDC’s point of view, which is reflected in the May 3 article from The Epoch Times:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which has repeatedly declined requests to comment on outside research, recommends virtually all people aged 6 months and older receive one of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines, regardless of how many shots they’ve received, although a [VRBPAC] meeting later in May is set to discuss whether to update the vaccine formulations to improve protection.
In the most recent news, this time dealing with a larger data set in the United Kingdom, the Office of National Statistics showed that those receiving four COVID-19 shots were 318 percent more likely to die than those who did not receive the jabs. Multiple news outlets covered this news (but not the mainstream legacy news, lest their pharma funding get withheld):
4x Vaccinated Youth 318% More Likely to Die Than Unvaxxed Peers, Office for National Statistics Confirms – The Exposé
Multiple COVID Shots Linked to Higher Mortality Rates in 18- to 39-Year-Olds • Children's Health Defense by Joseph Mercola
The Exposé reported on the disturbing results showing a marked mortality rate increase for those receiving a fourth COVID shot.
Initial observations of the data prove that individuals in this age bracket who had received four doses of a COVID-19 vaccine exhibited higher mortality rates compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
The source data for the above chart is available for download.
In every single month, four-dose vaccinated teenagers and young adults were significantly more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers and young adults. The same can also be said for one-dose vaccinated teenagers and young adults, and two-dose vaccinated teens and young adults in February 2023.
Maybe the sagging demand for the shots in Washington means that the horrible safety and efficacy information is finally reaching consumers. The latest DOH newsletter offered the following warnings to providers:
COVID-19 VACCINE AVAILABILITY UPDATE
The FDA's VRBPAC will meet May 16, 2024 to discuss and make recommendations on the selection of strains to be included in a 2024-2025 formula for COVID-19 vaccines. As manufacturers prepare for a potential change for the 2024-2025 respiratory season, availability of current COVID-19 vaccine products is changing. Specific products will become unavailable for ordering as expiration dates near or inventory is depleted. Product availability is expected as follows:
To manage the shorter vaccine shelf-life, we recommend providers place smaller, more frequent orders.
A glance at recent history shows that the fear of tossing out expiring COVID-19 vials is understandable.
In mid-May 2022, pharmacies, states, and federal agencies had to chuck in the trash 82.1 million doses (NBC News) because of Americans rejecting the shots in growing numbers.
Earlier than that, The Kansas City Star carried a story on August 16, 2021, about providers having to throw away about 81,000 doses of the COVID-19 shots:
Missouri vaccine providers have thrown away more than 81,000 doses of COVID-19 vaccinations, according to data from the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
The reasons vary. Initially, vaccines tended to go to waste as a result of handling issues, broken syringes or vials that ended up with unused doses at the end of the day.
In recent weeks, some providers said that a drop-off in people looking to get vaccinated resulted in doses that expired or couldn’t be used after they thawed too long in anticipation of demand for shots that didn’t materialize.
A week earlier, the Des Moines Register said the same type of thing:
Iowa has started tossing out tens of thousands of expiring COVID vaccine doses as demand for the shots continues to sag.
The state has discarded 81,186 doses of the vaccine so far, said Sarah Ekstrand, spokesperson for the Iowa Department of Public Health. That includes doses that expired, plus some that were wasted for other reasons, such as when a multiple-dose vial was opened and couldn't be used up quickly enough.
Later in the above article, a Des Moines University official failed to appreciate the principles of supply and demand:
Rachel Reimer, chair of the Department of Public Health at Des Moines University, said the situation is discouraging.
"It's so sad that we're throwing away so many doses when we know the vaccine works," she said in an interview Monday. In many countries, millions of people are desperate to get the vaccine, she noted. "And we literally cannot give it away."
This waste was met with your government’s ugly “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” campaign, in a desperate effort to stoke demand by shaming vaccine refusers, as covered on August 4, 2021, in The Defender:
Rather than admit defeat in the face of vaccine failure or vaccine refusal, media and government officials are now openly stoking the fires of hostility toward the unvaccinated.
US Representative Kim Schrier’s Ignorance of HPV Vaccination Reality
Last Valentine’s Day, ICWA Weekly News published a story about Dr. Kim Schrier’s six-minute congressional briefing presentation on the need for passing H.R. 3633, which would create a taxpayer-funded marketing campaign for HPV vaccination and testing to the tune of $5 million annually for the next four years and increase funding for breast and cervical cancer testing.
If Schrier, a representative from Washington’s eighth Congressional district, had the courage to venture outside of the vaccine marketing world, she would find herself facing a country in which, since 2022, almost 200 lawsuits have been filed against Merck alleging serious injury after receiving its HPV vaccine, Gardasil. Those lawsuits have been consolidated in the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division.
On May 4, Sharyl Attkisson covered the situation:
The injured Plaintiffs come from across the country stating that the vaccine caused serious injury and chronic poor health, including autoimmunity, encephalitis and neurological dysfunction, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), development of diabetes, premature ovarian failure and infertility, and death.
Furthermore, Schrier seems to have no understanding of the poor product she is promoting. Attkisson also wrote:
Gardasil was fast tracked to licensure by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2006 and first recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be given to all 11-12 year old girls. It was known at the time that Merck used an aluminum containing bioactive “placebo” in pre-licensure trials and only tested the vaccine in a small number of children under age 15.
The legal action asserts other claims that Schrier should be aware of:
The lawsuit alleges that Julie Gerberding, MD, MPH, the director of the CDC in 2006 “obligingly ushered” the Gardasil vaccine through the regulatory process prior to leaving the CDC and being named president of Merck Vaccines.
A June 2000 U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform hearing and August 2000 investigative report found that eight members of the Committee on Investigative Practices had a conflict of interest at the time that Gardasil was approved.
The lawsuit states that the U.S. House Committee on Government Reform report found:
“The chairman served on Merck’s Immunization Advisory Board and a number of the other members had received grants, salaries, or other forms of remuneration from Merck.”
Attkisson referred to the following three cases in her article:
One injured Plaintiff received a diagnosis of endometriosis and fibromyalgia after experiencing, “excruciating pain post Gardasil shots.” Another Plaintiff was diagnosed with Type 3 diabetes along with mood disorders after her second Gardasil vaccine.
A Plaintiff who has suffered from seizures and joint pain since receiving the Gardasil vaccines was diagnosed with Crohn’s and Celiac disease. While yet another Plaintiff has suffered from life-altering chronic body pain and memory problems since she had the Gardasil vaccines.
Two additional lawsuits were filed recently by mothers who lost their daughters after receiving the Gardasil vaccine. The mothers assert that getting the vaccine led to serious autoimmune and neurological dysfunction, which ultimately led to the deaths of their daughters.
For her story, Attkisson drew excerpts from The Vaccine Reaction published by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC).
Screen Protocol 7 in a Local Theater
What is Protocol 7?
Watch the trailer.
Protocol 7 is the true story about the corrupt practices of the vaccine industry. It’s time for the world to know—and for the corruption and harm to stop.
CLICK HERE TO HOST THE PREMIERE IN YOUR TOWN
Be sure to request May 29th at 7pm if you'd like to participate in the People’s Premiere. However, feel free to request whatever date/time works for you!
Facebook @Protocol7Movie | X @P7Movie | Instagram @Protocol7movie
Thank you for ALL this information❤️